Gabor Maté’s In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts — a sociological reading, with a salute to Jack London

Teaser

I start this project with a book that influenced me deeply: Gabor Maté’s In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts (Maté, 2010). It is an award‑winning, humane, and rigorously argued guide to addiction’s social roots and to more compassionate responses. In dialogue with Jack London’s John Barleycorn (London, 1913/2010), I sketch why literature and sociology belong together when we try to understand dependency, craving, and recovery.

Why Maté matters for sociology

  • Addiction as response to pain: Maté reads addiction as a learned adaptation to unprocessed pain and developmental wounding rather than as a mere moral failure or fixed disease label (Maté, 2010).
  • Continuum, not categories: From workaholism to opioids, he stresses a spectrum that pervades social life, shaped by family dynamics, classed and gendered stress, and market logics (Maté, 2010).
  • Relational and structural lenses: The stories from Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside are read alongside trauma science and social determinants, connecting intimacy, stigma, inequality, and policy (Maté, 2010).
  • Compassion and policy: Care, harm reduction, and decriminalisation debates are treated not as softness but as public‑health realism grounded in human development (Maté, 2010).

Classical resonances (my reading frame)

  • Durkheim — Anomie & regulation: Failed integration/regulation makes individuals vulnerable; addictive routines can “regulate the self” when social life does not.
  • Weber — Meaning & life‑conduct: Addictive practices offer meaning, routine and relief in rationalised, competitive settings.
  • Mead/Chicago School — Moral careers: Labels, interactions, and institutional pathways shape identities: from experimentation to stigma and the “career of addiction”.
  • Foucault — Governmentality: How states, medicine, and markets govern bodies and pleasures; harm reduction reframes governance toward care.

A literary companion: Jack London’s John Barleycorn

London’s autobiographical meditation on alcohol is at once exuberant and devastating. What I admire is its unflinching honesty about intoxication’s social pull — camaraderie, courage, performance — and its slow erosion of agency and health (London, 1913/2010). Long before contemporary addiction science, London shows how environment, masculine scripts, and work pressures contour drinking careers. Reading London next to Maté opens a humanistic corridor between memoir and sociology.

Method note: Grounded Theory, public memos

As in my other projects, I proceed in Grounded Theory mode: reading, memoing, coding, comparing. Each post functions as a public memo; concepts may shift as I integrate interviews, policy documents, and field notes. The outline of this series will grow with the project.

Implications I carry forward

  1. Treat addiction first as relationship: to pain, to people, to routines.
  2. Attend to structures (poverty, housing, care work, platform design).
  3. Center harm reduction and relational safety as baseline ethics.
  4. Keep literature in the analytical loop: memoirs compress lived social theory.

Literature (APA, with publisher‑first links)

Disclosure: AI as co‑author

I work with an AI co‑author for outlining, synthesis, and draft generation; I remain responsible for selection, verification, and argument. Any generative vignettes will be marked [HYPOTHESE].

Prüfprotokoll / Validation log

  • Status: Draft v1.0
  • Fact checks: Publisher details; award (2009 Hubert Evans Prize).
  • Date: 25 Oct 2025

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert