Sociology of Addiction

Sociology of Addiction – Beyond Individual Pathology to Social Understanding

Welcome to Sociology of Addiction, where we ask: What if addiction isn’t primarily a disease, moral failing, or brain disorder—but a social phenomenon shaped by structural inequality, cultural meanings, policy choices, and collective experiences?

This blog examines addiction through a sociological lens, exploring how social structures, cultural frameworks, and individual lives intertwine in the formation, perception, and governance of addictive behavior. We bridge sociology, social psychology, public health, philosophy, and political economy to understand substance use and addiction as fundamentally social—not just biological or psychological—realities.

The Social Construction of Addiction

What counts as “addiction” has changed dramatically across history and cultures. Harry Levine showed how the concept itself emerged in specific historical contexts, shaped by moral movements, medical professionalization, and political interests. Howard Becker revealed how drug users are made through labeling processes, not inherent properties of substances or individuals. Alfred Lindesmith demonstrated that addiction patterns reflect social learning and cultural meanings, not mere pharmacology.

Sociologically, addiction cannot be separated from social stratification. Robert Merton’s anomie theory helps us understand how blocked opportunity structures push certain populations toward deviance. Durkheim’s insights on solidarity and integration illuminate why social isolation and disconnection correlate with substance dependence. Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts of habitus and capital reveal how class position shapes both substance use patterns and recovery possibilities.

Support this blogging project voluntarily with just 1 EUR per month!

What You’ll Explore Here

This research-driven blog examines: structural determinants of addiction (poverty, inequality, trauma, anomie), social construction of addiction concepts and moral frameworks, stigma, labeling, and identity transformation in addiction and recovery, harm reduction versus criminalization in drug policy, social networks and peer influence in substance use, recovery as social identity transition (SIMOR), intersectionality—how race, class, and gender shape addiction experiences, celebrity culture and public addiction narratives, music industry substance use patterns and cultural normalization.

Each post grounds empirical addiction research in classical and contemporary sociological theory, showing how concepts like anomie, social capital, symbolic violence, and governmentality illuminate substance use, treatment systems, and recovery processes.

Our Approach: Structural Analysis Without Stigma

We analyze addiction sociologically while centering harm reduction principles and anti-stigma perspectives. This means examining how social structures generate vulnerability without pathologizing individuals, understanding policy as reflecting power relations rather than scientific neutrality, and recognizing recovery as socially embedded, not purely individual willpower.

Addiction is social. The forces that create it, define it, criminalize it, treat it, and sometimes heal it are fundamentally about power, inequality, culture, and collective life. Let’s examine them sociologically.